Our movement pushes us to the depths of the internal. We attempt to explain good by accepting that (1) principles are derived from internal values not influenced by the world, (2) seeking the origin of our principles, and (3) seeking to get closer to those principles by improving and refining our understanding of them.
A good example of illustrating how normal;c movement attempts to search for principle is a review of modern laws. Laws are not principles. Following laws is also not a principle, but it could be....lets dive in.
Modern laws are external constructs agreed upon by groups of people so they can freely and safely engage with one another with predetermined expectations. By choosing to live in a certain location we agree to the terms of the law in exchange for the benefits of the social system we live within.
Following laws because the state requires it is not a principle, as such emanates from the external. However, following laws may turn to principle if the reason for doing so is truth. The pursuit of truth is a principle, to always speak and seek what is true.
If one follows this principle, then one must honor their promises, as failure to do so is turning from truth. If we follow laws because we consider laws an effective promise made to our fellow citizens, then it is principled to follow them; such is the pursuit of truth.
We seek to explore beyond the external talking points, directing our efforts to the principles that guide us; seeking to determine where they come from.
What if following a law would violate another principle of yours; how do we decide which principles matter the most?
